Blog
AIMay 23, 2026Updated: May 23, 20265 min read

AI Coding Tools at Work: What JetBrains' 10K Dev Survey Actually Reveals

90% of developers now use AI tools at work. But the real story isn't adoption — it's which tools are winning in production. JetBrains' massive 2026 survey cuts through the hype.

L

Lugon

Vibe Engineer

Share article
AI Coding Tools at Work: What JetBrains' 10K Dev Survey Actually Reveals

The Hype vs. Reality Gap

Every week a new "AI coding agent" launches. Every day your feed screams that one tool has overtaken another. But which of these are developers actually using for real work — not weekend experiments, not demos, not pet projects?

JetBrains ran their second AI Pulse survey in January 2026. Over 10,000 professional developers, eight languages, globally representative. The data is blunt.

The Big Numbers

  • 90% of developers regularly use at least one AI tool at work.
  • 74% have adopted specialized AI dev tools — assistants, editors, agents.
  • 74% — that's up from roughly 50% a year earlier.
The market isn't theoretical anymore. It's matured.

Who's Winning: Adoption vs. Awareness

Here's where it gets interesting.

GitHub Copilot

Still the most known tool at 76% awareness, and 29% use it at work. But growth has stalled — both awareness and adoption plateaued since 2025. It's still dominant in large enterprises (5,000+ employees: 40% adoption), but it's no longer the default.

Claude Code & Cursor: Dead Heat

Both sit at 18% work adoption globally. Cursor leads in awareness at 69%. Claude Code has closed the gap fast:
ToolAwareness (Apr 2025)Awareness (Sep 2025)Awareness (Jan 2026)Work Adoption
Claude Code31%49%57%18%
Cursor——69%18%
Claude Code grew 6x in work adoption from April–June 2025 to January 2026. In the US and Canada, it hit 24% — the highest regional number. And it has the highest CSAT at 91%, with an NPS of 54 — the best in the market.

The Surprise: Google Antigravity

Google's code editor launched November 2025 and already reached 6% adoption by January 2026. Fastest new entrant in recent memory.

The Stumble: Codex

OpenAI's coding agent had only 27% awareness and 3% work adoption in January 2026 — before its desktop app and ChatGPT integration launched. The landscape may have shifted since the data was collected.

What Developers Actually Want

The survey points to three clear preferences:

  • Performance beats ecosystem. When a standalone tool is objectively better, developers migrate. Cursor and Claude Code gained ground not because of platform lock-in, but despite its absence.
  • Agentic workflows are real. 11% already use JetBrains AI Assistant or Junie. The shift toward autonomous coding agents is underway.
  • CSAT is the real moat. Claude Code's 91% satisfaction and NPS of 54 suggests that developer trust — earned through reliability, not marketing — compounds into adoption.

    • The Bottom Line

    The AI coding tool market is no longer about awareness. It's about retention and workflow integration. The tools that ship reliable results, earn trust, and fit naturally into existing workflows will win — regardless of how loud the announcements get.

    GitHub Copilot has the installed base. Claude Code has the momentum. Cursor is fighting hard. And Google just entered the ring.

    aicoding-toolsdeveloper-surveyjetbrainsclaude-codecursorcopilot
    Share article
    Start Your Project

    Ready to transform?

    Discover how TeguFy can help your business simplify, amplify, and fortify with AI, Blockchain, and cutting-edge technology.

    Request ConsultationView Projects